patching...
Breaking: Fatal Crash Reports on Mass Pike in Newton »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Patrick: We Need to Increase Income Tax to Invest in Our Future

Tell us: do you think Massachusetts needs to increase taxes to strengthen education and transportation?

 

In his State of the Commonwealth address Wednesday night, Gov. Deval Patrick proposed raising the state's income tax by a full percentage point and lowering the sales tax to pay for $2 billion worth of transportation improvements and early childhood education programs. 

"There is no good time to raise taxes. I know how tough the times have been on the people and families of the Commonwealth.  And though the worst of the recession is over, many, many families still face tough decisions and have deep anxiety about the future. I would not ask if I did not believe in my heart that investing meaningfully today in education and transportation will significantly improve our economic tomorrows," Patrick said.

Patrick said he wanted a more fair and comprehensive tax system that lowers the sales tax to 4.5 percent and raises the income tax to 6.25 percent. He added that he wants the proceeds to be dedicated to a public works fund that will support the transportation plan. 

"Under my plan, sales tax proceeds would be off limits for any other purpose," Patrick said.

To make the burden lighter on those who make less money, the governor said he'd like to double the personal exemptions and eliminate a number of itemized deductions.

The proposed tax hike seeks to pay for $2 billion in education and transportation improvement the governor wants.

The education spending would include funding high-quality early education and K-12 education, investment in public colleges and universities, and the re-invigoration of the MassGrants scholarship program.

For transportation improvements, the governor envisions "a bus or subway that came on time, was safe and comfortable and ran until a student at UMass Boston or a worker in a downtown tower finished up at 1 or 2 in the morning." He also spoke of faster commuter rails, a Green Line and went to Medford, commuter lines that reached the western part of the state and an improved highway system. 

"The people we work for want the schools I have described; they want the rail and road services we have laid out; and above all they want the opportunity and growth these investments will bring.  We on their behalf have choices to make. I choose growth," Patrick said.

What do you think? Is the choice between higher taxes and growth, and lower taxes and stagnation? Do you support the tax increase? Tell us in the comments below.

Related Topics: Gov. Deval Patrick and State of the State Address

italianmass

7:51 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Maybe you should cut your pay and see how you like It !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin MacDonald

9:35 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

1.)Eliminate local government waste including nonessential personnel.
2.)Eliminate State government waste including nonessential personnel.
3.)Recognize that our prison system is our cheap labor and bring jobs back from over seas.
4.)Start to educate and train our prisoners and rehab them to be able to contribute to society rather than drain it.
5.)Find ways to build up people's income so they can spend and help build on the economy. ( break up the monopolies that are causing inflation, institute laws that require manufacturers to eliminate planned obsolesence and product failure so we become respectable again throughout the world for our goods produced.)
6.)Create a grant program that funds worker's compensation and insurance programs for start up businesses to help create jobs and to temporarily help companies get off the ground.
7.)Create laws that keep investment money in our economy and our country.
8.) Establish a better equipped/staffed/funded retraining program to transition people into other fields of employment.( especially nonessential government workers)
9.) Review State pension plans to require investment in the Massachusetts economy.
10.)A penny that is doubled every day is better than a one time pay out of a million dollars. Desire a little from a lot of workers rather than a lot from a little amount of workers.

Debra Simes

7:54 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Yes. Transportation and education are critical linchpins in our Commonwealth's long-term health.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Frosty the Snowman

11:36 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Debra I utilize the MBTA to go to Red Sox games, I own a car that I paid taxes on, I pay taxes on gas and I pay tolls. Why should I have to pay out of my check for a stranger's ride to work? Take my gas tax and toll money and fix the roads, collect rider's fares and fix the MBTA system.

JohnnyMass

7:56 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Every time that I think that this clown has come up with every conceivable way to raid my wallet, he once again amazes me.

Reply

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

7:57 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Kimberly,

Let us hope you did not write the headline with the phrase, "invest in the future." Your future could be limited as a journalist. The headline should have read, "Patrick presses on with Democrat policies of tax, spend, borrow and elect."

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

Reply
Comment_arrow

IQ

1:31 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Being a reverend, I would think you would write a more balanced and caring comment instead of a party-line dismissal of the governor's proposals. Is there something wrong with investing in roads, rails, and children's education? As a reverend, I assume you're a member of a church, which is probably a tax-free endeavor anyway. So while you enjoy that status, you would deny health, education, and transportation to thousands of underprivileged and poor people, not to mention everyone else who would benefit from the plan?

Larry Lawfer

7:58 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Much of the infrastructure debt our transportation and road systems are facing is due to the Big Dig overruns. There is no doubt that controlling costs and raising taxes is the only way to achieve stability financially. It is painful and my hope is that partisan politics and the virtirol that so pervades these discussions can be put aside for a greater good. Living inside our means is just prudent and necessary

Reply

Earnhardt

7:59 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The Sales tax would be off limits. What about the income tax? His visions are grand, but we all know it will never happen, There will be cost overruns unto the billions, It will be years to completion, There will come the statement to the effect of: "We underestimated the cost of labor and materials. Therefore, we will have to increase the sales tax to 6% to make up the difference" Either way it will cost us much much more than what is proposed. Rail service that runs on time? There's a pipe dream. Yesterday's 5 inches of snow set the commuter rail back at least an hour or more. Keep dreaming Governor... only stop dreaming with our money!

Reply

Thomas Clapper

8:01 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

It is amazing how much money Gov Patrick has spent since he has been in office. And now he wants to spend $1.9 billion to extend the train to the South Shore? Plus the untold billions in other projects. He claims the Big Dig costs are a major burden from past leadership, now he wants to add to that burden for future leadership. As for investing more in education, that sounds great. But MA is already one of the best states in the country for education. Why do we need to add billions of dollars more to that? The scariest word in government is efficiency. Clearly this country has a major spending problem and MA is no different. But how about the government start spending the people's tax money in a more efficient and productive way? How about the voters of this state vote on some of these billion+ dollar projects? Just my thoughts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BellaNana

11:30 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I wonder how many people are aware that MA had the highest MCAST scores in the country? We actually had to lower our educational standards in order to receive $$ from the Feds. What's wrong with this picture?

Comment_arrow

SB

12:13 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Note that public higher education in this state sucks. UMass Amherst is ranked 42nd among state flagship universities (and is proud of it!!). At the same time it is one of the most expensive.

Comment_arrow

Frosty the Snowman

11:40 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

BellaNana, I'm ignorant of this topic, please help clarify. The "M" in MCAS stands for Massachusetts correct? of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System? Do people in North Dakota take the same test?

Comment_arrow

BellaNana

8:06 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Frosty, MCAST is the MA test. There is also the NAEP, National Assessment of Educational Progress. Although the test are different they are also similar and are used for national testing. I really should have done more research on the comparison. I believe the national scores are more in line with the NAEP. I was "quoting" a comment I heard on TV, or read in an article. For my own satisfaction, I will pursue. Thanks for pointing out.

Anne Johnson Mahon

8:03 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

It's interesting how the people who say they want us to live within our means don't realize that taxes go toward the public school system, public safety, and infrastructure in their towns. They use all these things, and complain that they aren't good enough, but then get upset when they realize there is a bill to pay to keep these things there for them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

8:33 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Anne,

There you go again... "Think of the children." Billions have been squandered with that mantra.

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

Isabella Jancourtz

8:16 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Instead of initiating costly, new "legacy" projects in our very shaky economy, Gov. Patrick should be working with the legislature to "strengthen the things that remain."

Reply
Comment_arrow

IQ

1:35 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

This makes no sense. What "things that remain"? What "things" are these "things" remaining from? And if you have been under a rock, you wouldn't know that MA has one of the strongest economic recoveries in the country. That means it's not shaky.

Eagles

8:27 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I think they said if best in the local Fox News last night: you can't ask your parents for more in your allowance and not be prepared to tslk about where you have been spending it. I personally think it will send our local economy in a tail spin. We are not fully recovered from recession, country wide we all just started giving back 2% more to ss and Medicare, and almost all of my family's expenses go up each year from food and gas, to healthcare and utilities. This would actually be the food out of my sons mouth, and the shirt off my back. I just can't afford it, and will move out of state before its taken from me.

Reply

SkimThreePercent

8:40 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

No. Raising the income tax punishes people who work (like me) for the benefit of people who do not (like Aunt Zetuni).

It's another wealth redistribution plan. Doctor Evil has taught Mini-Me well!

Reply

Elaine Murphy

8:43 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Patrick's education plan, starting with universal pre-school education, is outstanding and should be a model for the nation. There's no better investment in our country's future. Re: tax increases, we moved to Belmont from Southern California. Life here is a BARGAIN! Elaine Murphy

Reply
Comment_arrow

mary

8:11 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I would like to agree with you, but recent studies have shown that Head Start does not work--it is a waste of money. I would be willing to pay for a universal pre-school if it actually proved that kids are more successful in school, not as a free babysitting service. I have to put my own kids through college, and we are already watching every penny. Also, I grew up in poverty, didn't go to preschool, and I now have a Ph.D in science now.

Annie Mae

8:50 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I agree. I don't like paying more taxes but I think it's necessary.

Reply

Reader99

8:55 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I think the sales tax cut is a wonderful idea. But I think that pre school education is a waste of money. I started kindergarten at 4 and that was too young. This sounds like free daycare to me.

Reply

AerofanZ

8:57 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

We would have more money if he stopped filling needless positions with his neighbors, friends, and political hacks. Stop giving my money to fund illegals and EBT cards for a day out at the track.

Reply

Sallie Satterthwaite

9:12 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Like living in the magical land where it rains only while we sleep, we have come to consider it routine for our private budgets to include clean and comfortable year-round heating with no trips to the woodshed, winter getaways, food that is out of season or from thousands of miles away, SUVs for supermarket errands, miracle fabrics and designer brands for daily wear, and a hundred toys per child. In fact, we live better than royalty has for most of human history. Yet we expect to sacrifice none of this for the costs of public infrastructure and present and future social needs. No human endeavor on the large scale is ever perfect, but Patrick's direction is the one I want to be going in so that I can look my family -- present and future -- in the eye.

Reply
Comment_arrow

NWBL

10:38 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Sallie, that may be your lifestyle but it is certainly not for many taxpayers. And most of us pay more than "our share" already.

Natalie

9:24 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Politicians who want more money for who knows what use the same words: we need more money for education, for our kids. Isn't it such a cliche? I bet from 1.9 billion he is going to raise will go to pay for new management and programs that do nothing but employ his friends and relatives.

Reply

moe howard

9:37 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

You Liberals elected him......now live with it

Reply

pmotw

9:40 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Where are the spending cuts?

How many people have been added to the state payroll since Mr. Patrick took office?

How many more people are dependent on State aid since Mr. Patrick too office?

How many more people are collecting a pension since Mr. Patrick too office?

When he wanted to raise the sales tax, was that a bad idea because now he wants to lower it?

Look at what other states have down with taxes like Texas if you want growth.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BellaNana

11:47 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I was amazed when I saw, first hand, the property taxes that NH residents pay. Although NH is sales & state tax free, the residents make up the difference in property tax.

Comment_arrow

IQ

1:38 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Have you been under a rock for the last 4 years? You don't turn deficit into surplus without cuts. And up until now, there has been only a marginal sales-tax rate increase.

Earnhardt

9:40 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

What will Liz say? she was going to stand up for "US" be our "VOICE" wasn't she? Oh wait, on this one she will have to defer to the Governor... So much for that stance....

Reply
Comment_arrow

IQ

1:38 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Federal Senator, not state. Get your civics knowledge straight.

Michael Fleming

9:50 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Just when we barely avoid a second recession, and the economy starts meager improvements, both Obama and his understudy Deval think that is the signal to start on a whole new tranch of spending sprees. Fisal prudence is a phrase that Democrats don't seem to grasp. And such cliched phrases such as "building infrastructure" and "for the children" are trotted out once more without any embarrassment. But why shouldn't they? They've seen that the voters of this country are just as stupid as they think they are. Why not put the spending pedal to the metal? The country is populated by a bunch of "gimmes"...and they are multiplying.
Disaster looms ahead. Chris Christie, please run for President!

Reply
Comment_arrow

IQ

1:40 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Before you label Democrats as "spenders", remember how we got into this economic status in the first place.

John Toto

9:52 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Folks, there are MBTA bus drivers, Subway drivers, T Police officers, etc making OVER 100K. And I'm not even talking about the pensions they receive.
Once Deval cuts these pay rates and cuts the MBTA pensions...they have ALL the money they need....but they want more...because they love to throw money away.
Do the GOOGLE search on MBTA 2012 Salaries...it is an eye opener. Good story for PATCH to do...

Reply
Comment_arrow

IQ

1:42 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Is a lawyer that works for the MBTA undeserving of a good salary? How about the head of the organization? Of course there are people in government that make high salaries. Some people have difficult, dangerous, or demanding jobs. Just because someone works for government doesn't mean they should work for free, or make a wage that's less than livable for the service they provide.

Comment_arrow

Gary M

9:38 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

IQ,
It's drivers, police officers, maintenance,etc.. that all make over $100k with overtime. He's not talking about lawyers or the head of the MBTA. 631 people who worked for the MBTA in 2011 earned over $100k. The median household income in the state is $62k. I don't think driving a bus or fixing a rail line is more difficult, demanding or dangerous than the average person's job..

Pat Brown

9:58 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

"The MBTA estimates that the annual operating cost for the South Coast Rail will be approximately $26 million (in 2017 dollars) and that the new annual revenue associated with the new rail line will be approximately $5 million. This will result in an annual shortfall of approximately $21 million that will need to be funded from other sources."

From "South Coast Rail: A Plan For Action" by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation (page 36), posted here: http://www.southcoastrail.com/downloads/South_Coast_Rail_Plan_for_Action_04.04.2007.pdf

While I understand that public transit always requires subsidies, is it unreasonable to ask the users to pay fares that cover at least 30% of the cost of operations?

Reply

BellaNana

10:03 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Just like his buddy, Obama! How about cutting entitlements? Let's tax the hell out of those who actually work and ultimately pay for those who aren't. What's the percentage, those working & paying and those sitting on their butt taking? I truly believe there are some who really need, and they should be cared for. But how about the rest of them? Obama's Aunt, sitting on her ass for how many yrs, illegal immigrant, we, the tax payers have paid for her health, food, rent, etc. I wonder, does she have a nice car and big flat screen TV? Give, Give, Give, who does he think he is, Robin Hood? Enough is enought.

Reply

Newton Girl

10:04 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

What about the $105 Billion dollar transportation bill Obama signed in July? Of which Massachusetts is suppose to receive 1.2 billion for road and bridge work and $345 million for transportation? I guess this isn't good enough for Patrick. Liberals are always looking for ways to get more money out of us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

IQ

1:43 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Oh please. Like any corporation or business ISN'T trying to get as much money out of you as possible? You probably spend more on your cable bill in a year than in taxes to the state. Get some perspective.

Jim G

10:07 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

We must look at the big picture. One party rule eliminates checks and balances including balancing our checks. Multiple Speakers of the House are now felons. The Probation Dept is about to come under Fed investigation. The Lt Gov and his ties to Chelsea Housing scandal and his 108 mph joy ride cell phone records get broomed away. Illegal aliens dirve, kill, go to school at in-state rates and get free healthcare. Raises were given out by the Speaker and Senate President last month to their top staff members. MA lost a seat in Congress because there are less people living here and you read all the time of the "brain drain" where recent college grads who used to come to school and stay now beat it out of town for good once they get their diplomas and use their educations to look at comparative cost of living and quality of life data. They used to do that and stay. That's off the top of my head. So of course his Excellency now goes in front of his sycophant legislators and cries.. POOR MOUTH and talks of his vision and eventually says the "T" word after investment, blah, blah. There's more than enough money around if meaningful work is undertaken to look at wasteful spending and feel good programs that are patently unfair to the working Joes and Janes among us. Look in our own backyard. Rep Conroy has NEVER voted against any tax relief measure including the tax free weekend of last August. But he runs unopposed. We're all being played for fools and are thought of as such. Peace.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BellaNana

10:19 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I hear you, Jim. And they keep getting re-elected! Wouldn't you love to (a fantasy) screen voters? Oh, yeah, the polls don't ask for ID when people vote... just who are putting these Socialists back in office? And the list just gets longer! I'm so fed up.

Bill Montague

10:09 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

What he says makes sense! I agree with the Govenor! Cheers! Bill Montague

Reply
Comment_arrow

BellaNana

10:22 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Bill, just curious, no disrespect intended, are you a Giver, a Taker, or are you so financially comfortable that you're a liberal who is willing to pay more in taxes so we don't have to?

Comment_arrow

Jim G

10:34 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

With all due respect, there are many low information voters who agree with you.

Comment_arrow

IQ

1:46 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I agree with Bill. And just because someone agrees with the governor doesn't make them a "taker".

"No disrespect intended" but you'll go ahead and act disrespectfully anyway?

wtf

Comment_arrow

IQ

1:46 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

"With all due respect" I will now disrespect you.

Keith

10:16 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

With taxes and fees, yada yada, I feel I am paying enough already, and I am and I have been my entire adult working life. No more taxes, please.

Reply

rvd

10:17 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

On the surface this does not look good, since MA income tax in the total state tax basket is already quite high. In fact from 2007 data (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/19237_TaxFoundation_v2.gif) MA income state tax contributes up to 40%. The only 2 other state with higher income state tax portion are OR and MD.

Another issue is shifting tax burden and shrinking tax base. Obviously, sales tax affects all buyers, while income tax affects earners. I would like to see how income tax increase/sales tax decrease affects middle class. I suspect the burden will be on middle class shoulders, while ultra rich and poor will pay same or less.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marc

10:50 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The statistics show that in every year for the last 12 years Massachusettes has lost more people than it has attracted excluding International Immigrants. Massachusettes suffered a net loss of 213,191,000 domestic out immigrants residents; some to neighboring states and others beyond.

Comment_arrow

IQ

1:48 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Marc,

213 million people? Are you high? Are you saying that nearly the entire population of the United States has moved out of MA in the last 12 years?

WS

10:19 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Why doesn't Patrick start with taxing government pensions and raising the retirement age of state workers. Right now public pensions are exempt from state tax, and most government workers can retire in their 50s while immediately collecting hefty pensions and generous health care packages. We are living in two Americas here were the politically connected get to live at the expense of those in the private sector. I won't be able to collect my small Social Security check until I am almost 67 and will have to pay taxes on it. Most government employees will have been retired for well over ten years but that age and living tax free. Somethings very wrong here.

Reply

ttval

10:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Sadly raising the income tax will really hit the people paying most of the taxes anyway. The workers are the ones paying income tax, property tax, excise, and sales tax. How about raising the sales tax instead if you need money? Preschool is great but the government is just trying to pick up where the dead beat parents are failing. We don't need to raise everyone's children. Plenty of parents do an excellent job at this already. Maybe instead of all these welfare benefits (section 8, ebt, masshealth) the state just gives a daycare stipend and fuel assistance. If everyone could afford daycare while they work then there would be plenty of jobs in this field. With low income tax, businesses would be attracted to the area. Teach people the value and responsibility of a job and in turn they will be more reponsible parents. Also how about some copays for MassHealth at the Emergency room. Mine happens to be $250 and I have really great insurance if MassHealthers and Illegals were to pay just half that $125 upon walking in the door or having it deducted from their ebt, I think you would think twice about going in there for the sniffles. As far as transportation goes the state mismanages money ie. the big dig. MBTA workers also get crazy pay, pension, and retirement. I am all for paying my share of taxes but come on how about some revolutionary changes for the better.

Reply

Sudbury Newbie

10:23 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

It really is sad. Government keeps spending more and more and more. They want more of every dollar. They won't stop. It's not in their nature. It's not in a business nature either. The big difference is that people aren't forced to give their hard earned income to a business.

If anyone of you has ever run a business, you'd know that more money you have gives you the leeway of being less creative. The government does have enough money, it just need to focus on productivity.

Reply

John Toto

10:27 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Don't worry. Deval intends to send your hard earned tax dollars to people like Lawrence Mayor Lantigua. He'll be able to spend it better than you or I. Government knows best.
The War on Success and the hard workers is alive and well. Democrats are not fond of either successful people or hard workers.

Reply

Ugotta B. Kidding

10:28 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Whatever the excuse that is used does not matter. That the money will be spent on corruption, with connected corrupt cronies is OK too.

As long as politicians say they are doing for the children and people are only going to piss away their money on porn or video games or at church bingo, there is nothing wrong with increasing taxes more and more to "pay" for the "needed" improvements or the "vital" programs.

We are not only spreading the wealth, but we are spreading the bs too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marc

10:40 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Right on the Mark! I love the Bingo comment, LOL

Howard Kosrofian

10:30 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Let`s try this, all the state, county and local government pensions are void of state income TAX, let`s CHANGE THAT.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mark patterson

5:01 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Howard,the pensions are ALREADY TAXED! The money that I have taken out of my check each week is already taxed by the state of Massachusetts.My pension is paid for by deductions each and every week from my gross pay.If you're going to shout for change then at least get your facts straight!

Comment_arrow

siobhan hullinger

6:21 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

@ mark patterson - exactly Mark - if it were taxed, it would be a deduction from your NET pay. Gross pay deductions are PRE TAX

Comment_arrow

mark patterson

9:11 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Siobhan,I meant to say NET PAY. My error.I stand by my statement other than my that. I also paid into Social Security for 25+ years and can only get a maximum of 40% of that thanks to the so-called "Windfall Elimination Provision". I was self-employed for a number of years and paid DOUBLE into Social Security.Maybe the feds and state should stop giving out S.S. and EBT benefits to people who have never contributed a dime into the system.Ever wonder why alcoholics and drug addicts can collect Social Security Disability Income? Why are there homeless veterans while slugs like Obama's Aunt Zoonie are living in public housing?

Sallie Satterthwaite

10:31 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

While there are a lot of complaints about raising the income tax, there is very little comment of any kind about reducing the sales tax. Am I missing something? Won't this benefit everyone, especially people who are out of work and won't be affected by an income tax hike?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marc

10:39 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I still drive 20 minutes north to Nashua to buy anything significant or over a few hundred dollars. I Just spent $3,000 at Apple Computer. That's an extra $187.50 in my pocket Governor!

Comment_arrow

ttval

10:45 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

People out of work don't need to be buying anything but food and clothing and neither are subjected to sales tax. How would this really benefit anyone. Taxing income is taxing the people who pay the most taxes. Buying items is also a choice and sales tax is minimal if you are not making large purchases of items and services that are unneeded.

Comment_arrow

Gary M

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Sallie,

Are you serious? 93.5% of people in this state are employed. Median household income is $62,500. A 1% increase in income tax is $625 per year. If that same family spends $12,000 per year on in state taxed purchases, they only save $120. That means that the average family loses over $500 per year under the Governor's plan.

Still wondering why most people aren't happy?

Marc

10:35 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I'm ready to Move out of TAXACHUSETTES, it has become so expensive to live here. between property taxes, Insurance rates, the high cost of living, paying for the Boston Harbor sewer clean-up in my water bill, I just can't afford to live here anymore. The govenor needs to understand we cannot be a mini Switzerland when The Federal government keeps us in a constant state of War and spends Billions of dollars uneccessarily.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim G

11:18 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The traffic jams of loaded trailers heading south of north to NH horrific. Picture the cars as bags with dollar signs on them flying away with the subtitle on the bad saying "mad as hell and not taking it any more".

Comment_arrow

TheHam

12:23 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Same Here Marc, I'm on the market right now looking to move my family out of this shat-hole town. Hopefully, in 5 years from now (but probably sooner), the only people in Waltham will be the unemployments/illegal immigrants. Let's see how all you democrats like it when you're the minority to a bunch of dead beats. Maybe they can tax 95% of your pay to cover the cost of those who left (and have a brain). Sadly, most of you won't have a problem with that until you're in the unemployment line saying, "Gee, NOW I get why we shouldn't have put taxes towards criminals and their children, and drug addicts who collect unemployment/ebts". But sadly, you probably won't even realize it.

Michael Fleming

10:52 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

My my my...look at all the outraged citizens who don't like paying more and more taxes! Where we're you people when it came time to vote last November? I seem to recall Scott Brown and Mitt Romney were talking about this very issue. Mitt was even specific as to the number of "takers" in this country (47%) but was pilloried for being direct and honest about it. Well, elections have consequences don't they? Especially when the entire flippin' country is one big mass of "low information voters".
Any body surprised at Deval's new push on more taxes and more spending? I'm not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BellaNana

10:59 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Michael, You're right. Not a surprise... I didn't vote for them. Maybe I need to get more involved in the election & campaign process. Just like in Whoville, every voice needs to be heard.

Comment_arrow

BellaNana

11:06 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I should have added, by name, I didn't vote for Obama or Patrick. My comment seemed to be a little unclear on that point.

Comment_arrow

Earnhardt

11:37 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Michael I agree with you. I could see this coming.Turns out all the people on here who thought they knew it all were actually the low info voters, I am glad to say I voted for Romney and Brown. Now how is Elizabeth going to take a stand against higher taxes when her biggest supporter is the man proposing those taxes? My guess is she will remain silent. It's times like these I don't mind saying to some people, "I told you so."

Comment_arrow

TheHam

12:25 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

HAHAHAHAHA right on the mark Michael...

Marc

10:53 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Let's keep extending the unemplyment benefits too...I know of at least two people that make the same money they made while they were working, so their attitude is why should I look for work when I'm getting paid the same amount from unemplyment...and we wonder why this country is going to hell...

Reply

BellaNana

10:55 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Believe it not, I'm not opposed to a higher sales tax. We have family members who live out of state. Their sales tax is huge! Those who have more discretionary income buy more, and in turn, pay more. Usually for higher priced goods.

Reply

Mara

10:56 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

It IS expensive to live here but the alternative is inferior services. Try living in a state with low taxes and see how little support there is for education, mental health, the elderly, and the infrastructure. Then the cost is borne by family members and the downward cycle of poverty, no education, poor health begins. We all pay for that. This is not to say there are not places to cut in our budget...there are. But a 1percent increase is not bad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim G

11:15 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

A 1% increase is bad if a 5%+ spending correction eliminating waste is better. It makes NO sense to speak to new revenues until you seriously look at where the current revenue is being spent like on 19,000 no mail address welfare returned voter registration packet envelopes and on a $300,000 salary for the (now under investigation) Chelsea Housing Authority Director.

Comment_arrow

BellaNana

11:18 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Mara, I agree up to a point. I know MA teachers who have left the profession or have taken early retirement. Why, because they are no longer teaching math, science, etc. Now they need to teach respect, manners, discipline, etc. I won't accept the fact that both parents are working full time jobs and don't have the time. That's a cop out. Both my husband & I worked full time. As tired as we were, we sat down to help with homework, as do our children with their kids. if the Math is "Too New", one can get help from the teachers and in turn help their kids. Our children and their spouses work full time. Our children & grandchildren are amazing human beings. Respectful of others, polite, eager to help out. Parents own a piece of this.

Comment_arrow

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

12:05 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Not true... many low tax states have high quality of life. Why else would Texas be gaining population and congressional seats while Massaschusetts loses? Try to get out and travel a little more.

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

Comment_arrow

IQ

1:52 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Reverand,

States don't gain Congressional seats because taxes are low and everyone's making money and has jobs. States gain seats by growing population. Guess where there population increase is coming from?

And for the record, Texas has some of the worst poverty, healthcare uninsured, and private sector employment gains in the country. Where are you getting your supposed facts?

Nathanael Pine

11:03 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I don't know that what the govenor is proposing will raise that much in revenue. What he's doing is moving some of the burden from the poor to the wealthier segments of society. Personally I think we should leave things the way they are. I can tell you right now how to lower the costs for everything: get rid of the prevailing wage rules. They are set way way too high. Every job or repair on roads, railways, what have you is done at the highest possible cost. It is bankrupting this state. That's what the real issue is. We would have budget surpluses were it not for this.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BellaNana

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I know this won't go over very well, but... Unions don't help. I've worked in a union shop. Very expensive cost of operation.

Comment_arrow

ttval

11:45 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

If this were a "Right to Work" state then all wages would be driven down across all trades. These are actual working people not slobs with their hands out. Prevailing wages are not bankrupting the state a misuse of money is. They do projects with little oversight, why?, because they are corrupt and getting money on the back end. To BellaNana the difference between a union shop and a non union one is in a union shop the workers get a living wage and the owner makes some money in a non union shop the workers are paid shite and the owner makes a huge profit.

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

12:33 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

How come the Right to Work states are doing well... attracting people and employers, while the Northeast slowly collapses? Are people being forced to work in the Carolinas?

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

Reply
Comment_arrow

BellaNana

1:19 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

ttval, To a degree I agree. I've seen union workers & non-union workers bust their butt at work to be their best, and accept their responsibilities. I've also seen in both situations just the opposite. One thing that really drives me crazy in union shops..."Not my job". Boxes can sit, a truck can go unloaded, even in administrative jobs. I took some classes at a local state college. They completely messed up my payment. After some time the problem was not resolved. I finally called the Dean's Office. Was told by someone working in HIS office. "What do you expect, it's a union." I couldn't help but wonder, whose job it was to take my payment, then someone else to process it, then someone else to fix it. Really? This also happens in non union work place so it isn't an exclusive situation, but, it is very real. I don't have a resolution, wish I did. Come to me not just with a problem but with a solution. We can start work from there.

Charlie Kadlec

12:39 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The governor knows (or, let's hope that he knows) that any promises he makes, such as "sales tax proceeds would be off limits for any other purpose" can be ignored now and in the future both by the legislature and the governor, including himself. Making such promises does not increase the credibility of his message.

"Investing in education" is another meaningless phrase universally used by politicians to raise taxes. There is no correlation between the amount of money spent and the quality of education received by the students. Our own AB High School is a good example. For decades, we heard at each Annual Town Meeting that we do not spend enough, that our per-pupil costs are much lower than the state average -- yet ABRHS has been one of the top schools in the Commonwealth.

The answer to the governor's proposal should be : Massachusetts taxpayers need lower taxes, they need to keep more of their money so that they can invest in their future.

Charlie Kadlec
Acton

Reply

vito corleone

12:53 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

welcome to taxachusettes if i didnt have young kids and a biz i would leave this state in a heartbeat.its amazing how our state continues to tax us to death and the ultra rich keep telling us how great the schools are!the middle class is getting smoked!cut out all the freeloaders ,welfare and govt hacks salaries and we would be ok.what if we cut some govt donations to all the third world holes that we keep donating too and take care of the U.S. for once!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim G

1:55 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

We are looking to downsize now and the plan is to maintain 2 homes (one smaller here and one in NC). I am reconsidering why on Earth do I want to keep shelling out my savings, salary, and retirement $ to anyone here who can't see that the well is running dry. Not for nothing, my RE taxes here are at least 5x what they are in NC for a similar sized house. Services are basically the same, the weather is better and the state redder and has a balanced gov't model. Now there's a concept.

Norman Wirtz

2:31 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Per the CLT
Our state per capita tax burden is 4th in the nation, per capita debt the highest, and still we can’t fund our transportation system? Do management much?

After forty years observing “transportation financing” plans, we know the drill. Neglect the one function of government that should be a priority, on the assumption that Big Business will always jump on board and taxpayers will give in to new revenues for an essential service. Then float a menu of tax, fee and/or toll increases and watch everyone debate these to choose the least objectionable. Then start over with neglect, squander the new revenue, and come back for more in another few years.

We taxpayers aren’t playing that game this time. No gas tax, income tax, sales tax rate increases. An $86 increase in license renewal fees? You’ve got to be kidding. The voters mandated a 5% income tax rate; you haven’t done it yet. Get back to us when you’ve shown them some respect.

First do the management reforms in the package. Include an independent audit of the Department of Transportation: show us where the money goes, show us the savings from the 2009 Patrick reorganization of transportation departments.

New Hampshire has no income and no sales tax; and it repealed its prevailing wage law twenty-eight years ago. We’ve never heard anyone complain about the Granite State’s roads and bridges. How do they manage so much better than we?

Get management/reform done first, then get back to us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ttval

3:33 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Yes, New Hampshire got rid of it's prevailing wage law. How many people live in New Hampshire and work in Massachusetts so they have a fair, liveable wage? How many great jobs does NH have to offer? I agree with many of your points. I would like to see reforms in alot of the states programs before they come asking for more dough.

Comment_arrow

Charlie Kadlec

3:42 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

ttval -- anyone who works in Massachusetts pays Massachusetts income taxes regardless of where they live. Many people live in NH and commute simply because they cannot afford to buy a house in Massachusetts.

Charlie Kadlec
Acton

Comment_arrow

ttval

4:10 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

In reply to Charlie Kadlec I wasn't speaking from a income tax perspective but a general jobs one. While many people move to NH for housing reasons. Many also keep their jobs in MA because there are good jobs here. For example my husband and I used to live in NH, he would commute to MA because the difference in pay in his field was $20+ more per hour and there was more opportunity to work. Many of our friends also did this for the same reason.

Comment_arrow

Pat Brown

4:52 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Mr. Wirtz cites CLT as his source for the Massachusetts having the fourth highest tax burden.
http://www.salemnews.com/opinion/x1560864408/Barbara-Anderson-Beware-Beacon-Hills-charge-of-tax-and-spenders-brigade

The Tax Foundation generates a more generally accepted number showing Massachusetts has the eighth highest state and local tax burden.

http://taxfoundation.org/article/state-and-local-tax-burdens-all-states-one-year-1977-2010

Patch_comments_icon

Brooklyn Lowery

3:06 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

A comment has been deleted for violating our Terms of Service.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

5:15 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Someone probably used the 'R' word - Republican.

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

TB

3:32 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

What a surprise, a Democrat taking more money immediately after the Federal Democrats started confiscating more from our pockets (seen your paycheck recently?). Nobody with any experience living in Massachusetts can take this malarkey seriously. You are severely misguided if you think an income tax increase will go directly to transportation funding. You know and I know this money will just get dumped into general revenue, feeding all the bloated, inefficient government programs as payback to the unions and liberal-politically connected friends. Patrick’s bad idea violates the “user pays” principle of sound tax policy. Car and truck drivers pay a fuel tax to cover the road wear and tear they cause. Sure we need to build, maintain the roads and improve public transportation. So charge those who use it. Why take money from someone who doesn’t even own a car? Also let’s see these projects defined, debated and prioritized first, then ask for the money. But not in Taxachusetts – where politicians just take the money first because they think it’s theirs, not ours, then pretend we’re getting valuable services. No wonder the once great Massachusetts job-producing high-tech, manufacturing and financial firms are leaving as fast as they can.

Reply

Ugotta B. Kidding

6:45 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

A billion here and a billion there and pretty soon you are talking about real money...

Reply

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

6:55 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Steven,

Never did any of those things... plus, I never have to ask myself, "What if my Mother knew I turned out this way?"

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

Reply

Feemy Aganfade

10:30 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

The Devil (Deval) Is In The Details You Know Nothing About ! Soon Mass. Will Have The Highest Taxes On EVERYTHING Than ANYWHERE Else ! And Transportation Is Only The Tip Of The Patrick Iceberg ! And, yet, everyone is still smiling...
"...an array of potential tax hike options, such as an increase in the gas tax, a 0.16 percent payroll tax, boosting the state sales tax to 7.75-percent—or increasing the income tax to roughly 5.66-percent—a new green fee on vehicle registrations, a vehicle miles traveled tax, regular and modest fare, fee and toll increases..."

http://bostinno.com/2013/01/14/governor-patrick-massdot-way-forward-transportation-plan/

Reply

Nick Tomljanovich

10:52 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

If the ridiculously high (20%) state Income tax increase is implemented for middle class families making more than 100k the state should be renamed Taxxachussets.

Reply

Michael Fleming

12:09 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Charlie
Aren't income taxes determined by your address of residence, not where you work?
State payroll taxes are taken out of your paycheck, but income taxes are a function of your residence, are they not? I could be wrong on that, but the reason why people choose to live in one state or another is the tax rate that state charges their residents.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not a tax guy. Also, is there an official income definition of what constitutes "middle class"? Obama thinks incomes of $250,000 makes you a member of "the rich".

Reply
Comment_arrow

siobhan hullinger

7:17 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

If you work in one state and live in another, you still have to file an out of state return on your income.
People choose to live in one state or another for a variety of reasons. If it were only state taxes and fees, then no one would live in any state with high state taxes or fees. Businesses would leave those states and gravitate towards where the cheapest labor would be and where they would get the best "deal" for corporate taxes. Many states offer "incentives and tax benefits" - MA has been very generous in this arena - in order to keep work forces in their individual states.
Real Estate taxes are local taxes and it's what funds your town's fire, police, schools and town management.
Income taxes are taxed by both the state and federal governments.
Some cities and towns have local taxes, restaurant and hotel taxes, and others I'm foggy on that stay largely to the benefit of local government.
Add up all the taxes and fees ( a fee like the registry is just another form of tax) and you will be surprised how much you are left with in the pot.

Michael Fleming

7:21 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Thanks siobhan-
Your answer makes sense.

Reply

siobhan hullinger

7:49 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

NH real estate taxes are structured differently that MA. Real estate taxes in NH do not stay local to individual towns and cities. I don't know how they are set but it seems to me to look like a formula based on income levels and RE values. NH does not have an income tax or sales tax but they do have higher fees and more of them.

Reply

Michael Fleming

8:02 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

See? See why I'm not a tax guy? Jeez, taxes can get pretty complicated. That's why they need to be simplified...but I'm not gonna be holding my breath.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Charlie Kadlec

8:23 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Michael -- Slobhan answered your question before I read it, and yes, it gets complicated -- different states have different laws, state taxes for out-of-state residents may apply only to income earned in the state (salaries, not investment income, for example), etc.

The point is that by raising taxes on income Patrick will drive even more jobs out of Massachusetts. Many small manufacturing and R&D companies who may already have employees commuting from NH will decide that it makes sense to move.

One of the lessons that politicians never seem to learn is that raising a tax by x% does not mean that the revenue from that tax will increase by x%.

Charlie Kadlec
Acton

siobhan hullinger

8:10 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

I agree - flat tax is making more sense than ever.

Reply

BellaNana

8:34 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Siobhan, Property taxes in NH are determined by the local community based on property value. the residents also pay a count tax, school tax, and tax for municipal services. I really should confirm if these taxes are the current law. Yes, if someone works in MA they pay MA state tax on monies earned in MA? For some, the combination of NH & MA taxes are worth working out of state. I really don't mind paying taxes here. Our trash & recycled goods are picked up, don't have to do a dump run, our street is well plowed, sewer, roads... Police & fire, great response time to emergency situations by well trained, compassionate staff.

Reply

BellaNana

8:37 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Ok, so my flying fingers aren't working very well this AM. I meant county tax and didn't intend to add a ? After ...monies earned in MA.

Reply

TheHam

4:11 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Deval, if you had any brains, you'd raise the MBTA fare on THOSE WHO USE THE F&C(ING MBTA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I refuse to hand my tax dollars to you. Can't wait to move my family out of this sh**hole state..

Reply

TheHam

12:26 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Hey Mrs. Elizabeth Warren, Deval Patrick is "hammering" the middle class.. what now?

Reply

Michael Fleming

1:13 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Please notice Patricks phraseology: "invest in the future". First the word "invest". It sort of sounds like a person socking money away for a rainy day huh? That is always a good strategy. Sound money management, judicious use of your hard earned money, right? One "invests" their money for a reward later on, like retirement or for a college fund. Thing is, it isn't that at all. It's another word in the Democrat lexicon that has been poll tested as a better word for "spend". Another word:"the future". Why...I loves me the future! Use of that word means that I HAVE one, so yes, by all means, let's use THAT word a lot. So putting those two bright happy sounding words together, it will fool a LOT of people into thinking positive, happy thoughts and supporting whom ever said them. It doesnt matter what they actually mean. Lets support the political party that makes me feel good about my self !..regardless of the long term consequences! (notice how many times the feel good word "journey" was used in the innauguration speech by Obama and by Chief of Staff Plough?)
Dummies! The best way I know to have a brighter future is to NOT leave unpayable debts for my children and their children to pay off, and millions of able bodied Americans dependent on the government teat!

Reply

Leave a comment